Perceptual Map
Created by a male doctor over 80 years ago, the tampon maintains
significant shelf space in the feminine hygiene aisle at your local supermarket
or retail chain. Although not often talked about, this product category has
seen significant diversification in the past decade, leaving women with more
choices than ever. With this variety comes increased competition for existing
and new players in the field.
Market share data for the top-ranking tampon brands on the market was
acquired from a site called Statista. Pricing data was pulled from a single retail
site (Walmart.com) to prevent any variation in retail mark-up. Since Walmart is
also the largest retail chain in the United States, I decided to pull customer
rating data from their website. Please note that ‘private label’ ranked number
two on the Statista list with 10.4% of market share. This category reflects the
generic brand products that a retail stores offer. Even though I could not
determine if a certain retail store dominated this category or if it was a
blend of all retail stores, I decided to include it on the map with data from
Walmart’s private label, equate.
Perceptual Map:
When looking at this map, there almost appears to be a cluster
effect of brands by type of tampon. The older-style tampons are positioned at
the bottom-left quadrant including Walmart’s equate and Tampax Original. This
reflects the low-cost products that offer basic tampons with no new technology/features.
Clustered on the right-hand side of the graph with the highest price and middle
to upper ratings are the ‘newer’ style tampons that emerged on the market about
10-15 years ago. Tampax Pearl has the greatest share of the market while maintaining
a higher price point. Tampax was the first to the market with their innovative new
design. And even to this day, there are several brands with ‘me too’ products
that do not present any further innovation beyond the Tampax Pearl. U by Kotex
Click appears to be matching the Tampax Pearl in pricing and customers rate the
products equally.
Playtex Gentle Glide is a bit of an outlier with very low
pricing and high ratings. I checked other retail stores and found that this
brand receives high ratings with very low pricing on their websites as well. Their
market share is small compared to more expensive alternatives and perhaps the
company does not put as much marketing effort into the lower priced option as
they do with the Playtex Sport line, which is much higher in price with a lower
customer rating. Kotex Natural Balance security is in the middle of the field
with mid-range rating and lower pricing. The product is similar to the U by
Kotex Click but it features natural cotton vs. the mystery contents of their
other products. I would suggest that Kotex highlight this feature in their
packaging and marketing since this is a current topic of conversation and
concern among women on social media. It might enable them to increase their market
share for this product.
All things considered, these products are just one sector of the
feminine hygiene market. The market share for tampons in the feminine hygiene
category is large but potentially threatened due to new and innovative options
arriving on the market. Recent reports have revealed that millennials are moving
away from tampons as they seek out alternative options that include some
emerging players with ‘disruptive technology’. Any company or entrepreneur
entering this market would need to do so carefully. I would recommend coming up
with a competitively priced option that provides a similar offering to the Tampax
Pearl and U by Kotex. A more daring option is to seek out a new offering that
falls into the ‘disruptive technology’ category. However, this option is very
risky and there are already a lot of ‘disruptive’ players coming onto the
market.
Excel Data:
Copy of Tweet:
Sources:
Comments
Post a Comment